This photo, copyrighted by The Associated Press, shows an
amicable Tommy and Tammy shaking hands before their last “debate” Friday night
at the Marquette Law School Library. Moderator
Mike Gousha’s hand is just visible in the lower left of the photo.
I think it’s safe to say Tammy and Tommy won’t be shaking
hands again in the near future, if they can avoid it. This Senate campaign has ended up in the
muck, and both are throwing it.
Some people who’ve known Tommy for a long time say he
reluctantly went along with Karl Rove’s attack ad on Tammy’s 9-11 Patriotism;
some who’ve known Tammy a long time say she had no option but to counter Tommy’s
9-11 smear with one of her own.
This is what politics has become: both candidates with their
own sets of facts, who refuse to directly answer questions about specifics, and
simply repeat whatever lines their handlers have told them to use when talking
about the subject. You can’t pin them
down; even when a competent moderator like Mike Gousha asks Tommy directly
about his pandering to the tea party with his remark to the tea people “who
better than me to do away with Medicare and Medicaid?” Tommy just pivots and says “I’ve been a
moderate conservative all my life”.
Both Tommy and Tammy could benefit greatly by hiring an
elocution coach; Tammy more than Tommy.
Tommy’s tortured pronunciations and shattered syntax are part and parcel
of his very well-known public persona, and a well-spoken Tommy Thompson might
even be a net negative. We’re used to
his bluster and his dropped g’s and his repeated mispronunciations (“Ahmadeenajon”)
and constant flubs like “Gulf of Hormuz”.
Tammy’s not nearly so well-known in Wisconsin, and her
halting answers and constant interjections of “ahhh…” make her responses to
debate questions seem uncertain. In the
closing moments of Friday night’s debate, when Gousha got to the 9-11
(non)issue, Tommy launched into an obviously well-practiced response about not
questioning Tammy’s patriotism, but her judgment. Tammy’s “I am outraged that Governor Thompson
would make a political issue of a national tragedy” speech, no doubt also
calculated and practiced, came off as stilted and rehearsed. Unfortunately, this is the kind of stuff –
style elements, not substance – that tend to stick in the mind, and play too
large a role in the decision-making process about who’s the better candidate.
Mercifully, the “debates” are now over; no more Tammy and
Tommy; no more Barack and Mitt; and a creature named Sandy will take center
stage on the national news reports for the next couple days.
The cynic in me buys into the assertion that we get the kind
of government we deserve.
No comments:
Post a Comment