Missing, that is, by not watching Breaking Bad on
AMC-TV. Steve doesn’t watch a lot of
TV. In fact, he says the last time he
watched TV at home was prior to the turn of the century. So earlier this week, when he saw me change
my Facebook “cover photo” to the image below,
he wondered what it meant, and then created and published
his own version of spelling his name out in elements from the periodic table.
Infinitely more creative than the Breaking Bad Name Lab.
Steve is the smartest person I know, and I’m lucky to know a
lot of smart people. We met years,
decades ago in Oshkosh, when he strolled into my office at the old WMKC-FM, fresh
out of radio school at KIIS-FM in Los Angeles.
He inquired, in his beautifully-modulated bass/baritone voice, if there
might be any work to be had.
Hell yes.
We became friends as quickly as we became colleagues;
shortly after he decamped to the competition across town, I was thrown under
the bus at WMKC and wound up joining Steve and the crew at WOSH/WYTL. There, I
had the pleasure of working with, and eventually managing some of the greatest
on-air talent ever assembled in the Fox Valley radio market. Our stations
absolutely dominated the ratings and I made many good friends, with whom I
still interact with today.
Steve became a computer/IT whiz (demonstrating once again
that there is abundant life after radio) and has helped me with my
computer/tech problems for years. See
that “Rifles At Dawn” graphic at the top of this blog? That’s Steve’s creation. He also minds all the tech aspects of my
online life.
But, as usual, I digress.
Steve would like Breaking Bad. I can understand how he “fell away” from
television; simply put, there’s a lot of mindless crap out there. But since
Steve last entertained himself with the tube, circa 1999, there’s been a huge
change. While the traditional broadcast
networks are awash in smarmy reality shows, un-funny sitcoms thoroughly
dedicated to the lowest common denominator, and dramas which are either
cloyingly emotional or gratuitously violent, the “good stuff” has migrated to
the cable channels.
HBO wins bucket-loads of awards every year for its first-rate
programming. AMC has had hit after hit
with shows like Mad Men and Breaking Bad. Shows like Homeland Security and
Dexter on ShowTime regularly pull in six million viewers. And, to be quite blunt, these shows aren’t
the kind of shows stupid people like.
They force you to think. They
force you to pay attention. The writing
is stellar, the characters are multi-dimensional, the acting is of the highest caliber,
and the cinematography is often breathtaking.
Over the past six or seven years, much of the best writing
and acting talent has held forth on what used to be “the dark side” of the
broadcast entertainment industry: cable TV. And now, an entirely new venue of first-rate
entertainment is being developed by Netflix, and has even engendered a new
term: binge-viewing. My wife and I binge-viewed the 13 hour-long episodes of
House of Cards on streaming NetFlix, watching the entire series in less than a
week. We did the same with the new Netflix series, Orange is the New Black. This is a whole new extremely
consumer-friendly way of offering first-rate entertainment: all the episodes
are available whenever you want them. If
you want to devote a day to watching all 13 episodes, not waiting for a new one
to come out every week, Netflix gives it to you.
The 8 bucks a month we spend to have streaming Netflix
through our Blu-Ray player is the #1 entertainment value at the Morrissey
Compound.
And here’s another thing: many of these new shows, like
House of Cards, are so well-received that they beg for another season, so Netflix will
do another season. But, like Breaking
Bad, the series will come to an end. It
won’t go on forever, like ER, Gray’s Anatomy, and scores of other broadcast
network TV shows that started with huge promise but then “jumped the shark”
(Happy Days) and devolved into maudlin mediocrity.
There’s an old saw that says when you envision a beginning,
envision an end – and that’s one of the things that makes these new cable-only
or Netflix-only shows so good: the writers can focus on developing a plot that
comes to a conclusion, and they don’t have to invent artificial devices just to
keep the show alive for another 13 weeks/episodes. Hence, each episode is focused, moves the
plot forward to a definite conclusion.
Gee, whoda thunk the formula “beginning, middle, end” would ever work???
So, Steve, since this post is for you, why would you like
Breaking Bad? Because it’s a smart show
about a smart guy. Don’t worry, no
spoilers here. Walter White is a high
school chemistry teacher, brilliantly played by Bryan Cranston, who missed his
chance at being a billionaire by selling out his share of what became a huge
software company, for five thousand bucks.
When White discovers he has lung cancer, he “breaks bad” as the young
folks say, and becomes a meth cook, to ensure that his family will survive financially after he's gone. Not
just any meth cook, but the best by-God meth cook in the world. The chemistry alone, Steve, would fascinate
you. There have been monographs written
about Walter White’s now famous P2P meth cook.
Here’s a link to one of the many analyses of Walt’s meth cook which I
think you’ll enjoy, Steve.
Through the course of six seasons, White’s character evolves
(devolves?) from a mild-mannered high school chemistry teacher to the most
ruthless, murdering, conniving, savvy, successful drug dealer imaginable. And he does it right in front of his brother-in-law,
an FBI/DEA agent. And right now, we’re
in the final confrontation between Walt and Hank (the brother-in-law). The trip to this point, this breaking point,
if you will, has been a breathless ride from Walt’s beginnings as a meth cook
with a unique recipe operating a small-time lab in a big-ass RV, through his
evolution to running the most sophisticated meth lab ever created (and the show
spares few details, Steve), to his ascendancy as the premiere drug lord of all
the southwestern US and most of northern Mexico.
That’s why the name lab feature of Breaking Bad’s online
presence is so popular: chemistry is central to the development of the show.
And you’ll love this, Steve: at one point, when Walt is
beginning to move from street-level supplier to regional meth wholesaler, one
of the drug overlords he’s about to dispatch asks him his name, and he replies “Heisenberg”. See what I mean about this being a smart show
for smart people?
So, my friend, with only a few episodes left, Breaking Bad is
on an express elevator to hell, and characters are falling left and right. And in a few short weeks, this show will be
over. Should you ever decide to watch TV again, Steve, may I humbly recommend
that you begin with Breaking Bad?
Again my friend, you hit the nail on the head.
ReplyDeleteThank you, my friend!
ReplyDeleteColonel,
ReplyDelete"Some of my best friends talk to chemists," as Leon Lederman said.
I have a similar appreciation for good TV; and you're right: I didn't see much of it in '99 when we cancelled our cable subscription. The thing that got me most was that I had to be sitting in front of that infernal box at such-and-such a time in order not to miss it.
And, of course, the ads. And, of course, if you missed a bit of dialog that dealt with the whole point of the show, you couldn't rewind. The usual TV annoyances.
But as a kid, oh, man! "Star Trek" was a revelation. And all of us kids would rush up to watch TV after dinner each night (after doing the dishes, of course). We even enjoyed the flops like "Mr. Terrific" and "Captain Nice". To this day I can tune out absolutely everything if I start watching something on TV.
Unlike my roommate, Rick Hansen, in the WMKC days. He'd get home from work, flip on the TV on his way to the kitchen, grab a box of treats (Hostess Ho-Hos, if I remember correctly), plop down in his armchair, turn on the police scanner, open the TV guide, and call somebody on the phone. Multi-tasking while watching TV was as easy as breathing for him. Not me.
I know that it's different now. But I'm content to keep my memories of the 2nd to last TV I owned in '93 when "The X-Files" ran and "The Adventures of Brisco County Jr." came on just before. It was a set I'd been given by somebody. It took 15 minutes for it to warm up enough for a picture to be visible...complete with TV static flashing on and off during the last few minutes of the warm-up cycle. I told my future step-sons that they were alien signals from outer space interfering with my television reception.
I used to tape shows on that TV, and I got pretty good at pausing and re-starting the tape to skip all the verdammt ads. I watched 5 hours of "Star Trek: The Next Generation" on that TV with one of my sisters when that show went off the air.
I don't miss TV. We were only watching "The X-Files", "Pinky and the Brain", and "The Animaniacs" when we decided to cancel the subscription to cable. In the interim I've satisified my occasional TV cravings with visits to the library's DVD collection, and then Netflix for a while.
But I'll make this promise: I'll make use of my oldest step-son's Netflix subscription and begin watching "Breaking Bad" on the strength of your recommendation.
The Town Crank
Neenah
You'll enjoy it, Steve. And, I'm sure you're aware of the magical device called DVR - digital video recorder - which is a low-cost option built right into the satellite or cable receiver. Since the proliferation of the VCR, the networks have been trying to get us to watch things only on THEIR schedule by counter-programming popular shows (same time slot, different net). Most VCR's could only record one thing at a time. But now, DVR's are available for very little cost that can record 2, 3, or 4 TV shows simultaneously. Sunday nights Toni and I record most of our weekly viewing...simply by setting the DVR. And most DVR's have a "skip" feature, with a convenient button - each time you press it, you skip 30 seconds; so, to skip past a 3-minute stop-set, you just press the button six times, and bam! You're back into programming with no annoying ads.
DeleteIf indeed you do watch Br Ba via Netflix, start right at the beginning. I think you'll enjoy it; it's really some of the best "commercial" TV available.
ReplyDeleteFrom a jurisprudential point of view, the ruling on trading in digital currencies is divided into two parts:
Ruling on trading in official digital currencies
حكم التجارة الرقمية
Jurists have decided to allow transactions using digital currencies that are officially recognized in every country if they become an official alternative to paper currencies. If it is subject to the regulation of central banks under the supervision of state governments. If the responsible authorities pledge to exchange digital currencies for their value from various types of goods or from local production in each country. The reason for that ruling is the analogy with paper currencies issued by central banks and used by people in every country. After the real value of some currencies disappears and people accept to deal in digital currencies as a monetary instrument that has no real cover, it may be characterized by relative stability in the market price.