So, Mitt Romney pushed down some boy and cut some of his
hair off. And this happened 47 years
ago. And this “proves” that he’s a
bully?
I don’t know what it’s going to take to change this cycle of
charge and response regarding ludicrous minutiae, but this latest “gotcha” about
Romney is ample evidence, as if more were needed, that our political system is
doomed unless it changes radically.
Radical, as in “from the roots”.
To me, it is absurd that this item is even carried by “mainstream
media”; that it is constantly repeated and expanded upon; that it persists
(lead story on at least two national TV news shows this morning); that anyone
even CARES about this; and that some of the less intellectually endowed among
us seem to think this “proves” that Romney is a bully.
It wasn’t that long ago that dreck like this was fodder only
for the tabloids. But, as has been
demonstrated time and again, TV news isn’t news; it’s entertainment.
I don’t give two hoots in hell for Mitch Romney (around the
house, I call him “Mike Rummy” to my wife) and have, as a parent, learned
first-hand that bullying is not to be trivialized. I’ll say this for Romney’s handlers: they
have learned that the only way to deal with this crap is to acknowledge it
without admitting to it (“I don’t remember the incident”), apologize, and then
move on.
There will be the pundits who will say Romney’s apology was
not sincere (Rachel Maddow and CNBC); the left will act as though this is the
most offensive act ever perpetrated by one human being on another, and will
theorize that this schoolyard scuffle set the pattern for a man who loves to
fire (bully) people. I’m waiting for
somebody in Wisconsin to find someone to come forward and say Scott Walker
bullied him in school, setting the pattern for Walker’s bullying of the public
employee unions.
It’s been a great week in politics. A man who’s now on his fourth wife, preaching
to his national radio audience about the sanctity of marriage; the voters of
the Badger state disrespecting women by electing a man to run against Walker (“it
was Kathleen’s turn; she deserved to win”); and another GOTCHA moment regarding
a candidate for national office.
Next thing you know, they’ll be telling us our city council
members are TEXTING each other during those marathon council meetings, and we’ll
have to get all riled up about “secret closed meetings” and whether those texts
are different from a couple council members talking quietly to each other in
the hallway outside the council meeting.
We are fiddling insanely while Rome burns.
Except that this incident and the non-apology (kind of laughing when he said it) go to the heart of character. How is going to govern all of the people when he clearly has disdain and hostility to many of the population. The man doesn't have the character to be President in addition to his many other flaws.
ReplyDelete....which is why I indicate clearly in this post that I don't give two hoots in hell about Mike Rummy.
DeleteActually, I've heard less about Milt Rombly's alledged high school bullying than I have about Bristol Palin's views on gay marriage. She's not running for anything so why does that get so much coverage? Is it because she was on Dancing with the Stars?
DeleteWe are fiddling insanely while Rome burns
ReplyDeleteAs I recall, it was Nero who was fiddlin'.
The current-day "leader" has partaayyed in the fund-raising style at a rate around 300% of the last President, has played more golf than Arnold Palmer, and (according to the White House schedule) is in the office about 3 hours/day.
But he does NOT "fiddle."
An anonymous commenter here observed "that this incident and the non-apology (kind of laughing when he said it) go to the heart of character."
ReplyDeleteI agree. Character matters. We are the aggregate of what we do. It's an old-fashioned attitude, but maybe that's just me. Your mileage may vary.
Mitt Rmoney has been a bully and a predator all of his life. The defenseless have always been his targets.
His premeditated prep school attack (in the company of a band of toughs he organized for the occasion) on a younger classmate -- a powerless outsider -- was a signal act of cowardice and moral turpitude. But it was hardly the only one Willard the governor's jerk son has displayed.
He has shown, time and again, that he has no compunction about, say, buying a company and forcing it to load up with debt, paying himself with the borrowed money, and then standing back while that company goes broke, wiping out the livelihoods of its employees in the process.
He has been almost gleeful about it, once exclaiming that "I like firing people!"
In serial depredations, callous exercises in greed conducted under the camouflage of free enterprise, this vulture treated those loyal, trusting folks no better than he did his dog - or his fellow candidates. Or his fellow bankers for that matter. How many of them were left holding the bag when he grew wealthy by gaming the bankruptcy laws?
If Mittens has a moral compass, it does not track true. He backs, he fills, he dissembles, he lies ... The list of his sociopathic acts is long and his behavior disturbingly vicious. But all of that is beside the point.
What we really should keep in mind is that we can choose him, or not. We get the government we deserve.
That adage, of course, goes beyond the current GOP candidate for president, but since we're on the subject, I'll stay with it for one more sentence: If the Waffle Man's America is what we want, then have it we shall.