Tomorrow is a primary election day, and while this news is
greeted with a yawn by 90% of the eligible voters in the state (turnout is
predicted to be 10%), for some of us it’s a must-vote day.
By any metric, our state Supreme Court – pictured above – is
one of the most dysfunctional, politicized bodies in the nation. Half of them are, let’s face it, bought and
paid for by left-leaning “progressive” political organizations; the other half
are in essence a wholly-owned subsidiary of the very right-leaning Wisconsin
Manufacturers and Commerce.
Patience “Pat” Roggensack wants a second 10-year term on the
highest court, and she’s the only one of the three candidates with enough money
to do TV ads. Her ads are paid for by an
outfit called “Wisconsin Club for Growth”, which in English is pronounced “The Republican
Party”.
Marquette University Law Professor Ed Fallone and Milwaukee
consumer law attorney Vince Megna are also running. The top two vote-getters advance to the April
4th general election.
Roggensack’s TV ads claim she’s supported by just about
every county Sheriff and law enforcement agency in the state, and when a
candidate touts that fact, and that fact alone in their TV ads, you know which
way they lean, even though the ads also loudly proclaim she’s a “fair and
impartial” judge. It's my opinion that a “fair and impartial”
judge wouldn’t trumpet her only claim to fame as being the darling of the cops.
But then, there aren’t many cogent adults in Wisconsin who
don’t know which way any given Justice of the State Supreme Court leans. Our “non-partisan” highest court can easily
be broken down into left-leaning and right-leaning: Roggensack, along with
Justices Annette Ziegler, Michael Gableman, and David Prosser (former
Republican Assembly Speaker, appointed to the court by Tommy Thompson and
re-elected, who clearly has rage and impulse control issues) are right-wingers;
Chief Justice Abrahamson and Justices Ann Walsh Bradley and N. Patrick Crooks
are left-wingers.
Non-partisan? Not really.
Considering Justice Gableman and Justice Ziegler’s well-publicized
ethics issues, Justice Prosser’s apparent proclivity to try and strangle
Justices who hold a different opinion, and the parade of name-calling attack
ads that characterized the last three state Supreme Court races, we’ve got a
real mess on our hands. More than a few
media editorial boards in Wisconsin have begun calling more loudly for Supreme
Court Justices to be appointed, not elected.
As regards tomorrow’s election: I’ll be voting against,
rather than for. The decision is yours,
but please vote.
Thank you for that précis, Colonel. I was thinking idly about looking up information on the three judicial candidates...and my desultory prayers are answered!
ReplyDeleteThe Town Crank
Neenah
I'm not sure exactly why but this website is loading incredibly slow for me. Is anyone else having this problem or is it a problem on my end? I'll cheсk back later
ReplyDeleteοn and see if the ρroblem still exiѕts.
Ηere is my web ѕite ... V2 cigs
Hi, V2 cigs, and thanks for stopping by. I checked to see if the website was loading too slowly, and discovered a discarded electronic cigarette in the works. Removed it, and now it seems to be loading just fine.
DeleteYes.
ReplyDeleteIt is curious, indeed, that Bradley suddenly "remembers" the assignment of a Praetorian Guard troop to keep her safe in the dangerous halls of the Court.
Curious, largely because no one else but Tubbs "remembers" this--and he didn't bother to commit the assignment of The Guard to paper.
I've seen that Bradley-esque behavior before. Usually, it's false charges of rape.